Legal Opinion
Slack v. James
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided June 6, 2005No. 25998PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Justice MOORE:
We granted a writ of certiorari to review the Court of Appeals’ decision reversing the trial court’s order granting a motion to dismiss counterclaims made by respondents. Slack v. James, 356 S.C. 479, 589 S.E.2d 772 (Ct.App.2003). We affirm the Court of Appeals.
FACTS
Petitioners (Sellers) and respondents (Buyers), each represented by real estate agents, entered into a written contract for the sale of Sellers’ home for $1,208,000. The sales contract includes the following provisions:
14. ENCUMBRANCES AND RESTRICTIONS. Buyer agrees to accept property subject to: ... restrictive…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Andrew Whelan v. Tyler AbellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company v. Nicholas Yanakas, Charles Buonincontri and Camille BuonincontriCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Arnold R. Rissman v. Owen Randall Rissman and Robert Dunn GlickCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Gilliland v. Elmwood PropertiesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
- Redwend Ltd. Partnership v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Abry Partners V, L.P. v. F & W Acquisition LLCCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2006
- Colorado Coffee Bean, LLC v. Peaberry Coffee Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2010
- Rodarte v. University of South CarolinaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2017
- Moseley v. ALL THINGS POSSIBLE, INC.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2010
- Midland Mortgage Corp. v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2013
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.