Midgett v. Midgett
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtMallard, C.J.
In this action for the recovery of land and for trespass thereon the allegations of plaintiffs as to their title and the trespass of the defendant are denied. It was then incumbent upon plaintiffs to establish both the issue of ownership and the issue of trespass. Locklear v. Oxendine, 233 N.C. 710, 65 S.E. 2d 673, Andrew's v. Bruton, 242 N.C. 93, 86 S.E. 2d 786.
In Andrews v. Bruton, supra, it is said:
“It seems appropriate to call attention to certain well-established rules. Their allegations as to title having been denied, it was incumbent upon plaintiffs to establish both ownership and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mobley v. . GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
- State v. HewettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Andrews v. BrutonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Locklear v. OxendineSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Norman v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Lawing v. LawingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Prevette v. BullisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- Hedden v. HallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
- Moore v. StricklandCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. WrightCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.