Legal Opinion

State v. Wright

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 22, 1972No. 722SC764PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHN, Judge.

Defendant’s first assignment of error challenges questions directed by the trial judge to various witnesses and asserts that these questions, by indicating to the jury that the trial judge held the opinion that defendant was guilty, were prejudicial to defendant. The standard to be followed in the examination of witnesses by a trial judge was stated in State v. Colson, 274 N.C. 295, 163 S.E. 2d 376, cert. den. 393 U.S. 1087. “If by their tenor, their frequency, or by the persistence of the trial judge [the questions] tend to convey to the jury in any manner at any stage of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. GoinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. State v. ColsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. State v. FreemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  4. Midgett v. MidgettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
  5. Carolina Power & Light Company v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. SteeleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  2. Brown v. VickCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API