Legal Opinion

Moore v. Strickland

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 20, 1974No. 744DC787PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Judge.

The appellant in his record on appeal undertakes to set out 20 assginments of error based on a like number of exceptions, without making any attempt to group his assignments of error. The exceptions appear nowhere in the record except in the purported assignments of error. Such exceptions are completely ineffectual and will not be considered on appeal. Rule' 21, Rules of Practice in the Court of Appeals. State v. Hewett, 270 N.C. 348, 154 S.E. 2d 476 (1967) ; Dilday v. Board of Education, 267 N.C. 438, 148 S.E. 2d 513 (1966) ; Bunn v. Bunn, 262 N.C. 67, 136 S.E. 2d 240 (1964) ;…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. HewettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. Bunn v. BunnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  3. Holden v. HoldenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  4. Dilday v. Beaufort County Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  5. Midgett v. MidgettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Peoples Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  2. All Carolina Crane & Equipment, LLC v. Dan's Relocators, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  3. Walton v. LloydCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API