Legal Opinion

Hedden v. Hall

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 6, 1974No. 7430SC542PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Judge.

At the outset we note two shortcomings in record and briefs which have caused some difficulty in our consideration of this appeal. First, none of the maps before us seem to have been prepared for the purpose of showing the contentions of each party to this lawsuit, and, therefore, they are not conducive to a clear understanding of the case. “It is highly desirable in the trial of a lawsuit involving the location of disputed boundary lines to have one map showing thereon the contentions of all the parties.” Midgett v. Midgett, 5 N.C. App. 74, 168 S.E. 2d 53 (1969). Second,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Paris v. Carolina Portable Aggregates, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. Virginia-Carolina Tie & Wood Co. v. DunbarCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1939
  3. Midgett v. MidgettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
  4. Bowers v. MitchellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  5. Turner v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brooks v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  2. State v. WrightCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  3. Town of Jackson v. ShawWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Town of Jackson v. ShawWyoming Supreme Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API