Legal Opinion

SAIF Corp. v. Sprague

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 2009No. Agency 00-07404, 01-01561; CA A133701; SC S056541PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBalmer, J.

This workers’ compensation case requires us to review the statutory classifications for medical conditions and, in particular, to determine when an insurer is responsible for medical services necessary to treat those conditions. Claimant sustained a workplace knee injury in 1976 and received treatment for that injury. Nearly 25 years later, his knee had deteriorated to the point that a physician recommended knee replacement surgery. Before that surgery could be undertaken, however, claimant had to lose weight. Claimant’s doctor recommended gastric bypass surgery, without which the knee…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Williams v. Gates, McDonald & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Sprague v. United States BakeryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  3. Sprague v. United States Bakery, Saif Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  4. SAIF Corp. v. SpragueCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Brown v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Brown v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  3. Hopkins v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Arms v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  5. Garcia-Solis v. Farmers Ins. Co. (In re Comp. of Garcia-Solis)Oregon Supreme Court · 2019

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API