Hopkins v. SAIF Corp.
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWalters, J.
This case requires that we determine the legislature’s meaning of the term “arthritis” in ORS 656.005(24)(a)(A). We conclude that, in defining preexisting conditions for workers’ compensation claims, the legislature intended the term “arthritis” to mean the inflammation of one or more joints, due to infectious, metabolic, or constitutional 1 causes, and resulting in breakdown, degeneration, or structural change. We also decide that the evidence in the record was sufficient to permit the Workers’ Compensation Board (board) to find that, at the time of her work-related injury, petitioner…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- Miller v. Water Wonderland Improvement DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- McHorse v. Portland General Electric CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1974
- Karjalainen v. Curtis Johnston & Pennywise, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Comcast Corp. v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 2014
- Brown v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 2017
- Brown v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- Schleiss v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 2013
- Oregon Ass'n of Acupuncture & Oriental Medicine v. Board of Chiropractic ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.