Sprague v. United States Bakery, Saif Corp.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P. J.
SAIF petitions for reconsideration of our opinion in this case. Sprague v. United States Bakery, 199 Or App 435, 112 P3d 362 (2005). According to SAIF, “[tjhe error identified by the court in this case is harmless because the major contributing cause standard applies irrespective of whether claimant’s condition is characterized as a ‘consequential condition’ or a ‘combined condition.’ ” We allow reconsideration and adhere to our original opinion as modified.
We briefly restate the facts in this case to frame the issue properly. Claimant seeks reversal of a Workers’ Compensation Board order…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Fred Meyer, Inc. v. CromptonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- Sprague v. United States BakeryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
3Cited by8 opinions
- Brown v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- SAIF Corp. v. SpragueOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- SAIF Corp. v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- SAIF Corp. v. SwartzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- SAIF Corp. v. SpragueCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.