Legal Opinion

Arms v. SAIF Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 4, 2015No. 1002902, 1005062; A150954PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHadlock, J.

Claimant suffered a compensable spinal injury at the C5-6 level while working for employer in 2003. He received spinal fusion and discectomy surgery for that condition. While claimant was being treated for that injury, imaging revealed a preexisting degenerative disc disease at the C6-7 level. In 2010, claimant’s surgeon recommended discectomy and fusion surgery for the preexisting C6-7 disease. Claimant requested that SAIF, employer’s workers’ compensation insurer, authorize that surgery, asserting that the 2003 surgery had worsened the C6-7 degeneration. SAIF denied compensability of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  2. Drew v. Psychiatric Security Review BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  3. SAIF Corp. v. SpragueOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Luckhurst v. Bank of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  5. SAIF Corp. v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Carrillo v. SAIFCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  2. Bandon Pacific, Inc. v. Environmental Quality CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  3. Hendrickson Trucking, Inc. v. Oregon Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  4. Minor v. SAIF Corp. (In re Minor)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  5. Sullivan v. SAIFCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API