Garvey v. Lashells
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. W. F. Aram, Coburn & Collier, and Lewis A. Hilborn, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.
On September 25, 1903, plaintiff and Lucien Guilbert and P. J. Garvey, claiming to own the same, were in the exclusive possession of certain mining ground known as the ‘ ‘ Garvey Bar Placer Mining Claim, ’ ’ which consisted of the ground embraced in two locations, one being designated the “Garvey Boys Mine” and the other the “Last Chance.” They had been in such possession for five years, mining and operating the ground. On that day they entered into a written agreement with defendant LaShells, whereby they agreed to sell to him said “Garvey Bar Placer Mining Claim,” with all machinery…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Frink v. ThomasOregon Supreme Court · 1891
- Hicks v. LovellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Ex parte SticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Gates v. McLeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Worley v. NethercottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Hines v. BrodeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Runyan v. Pacific Air Industries, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1970
- Gervaise v. BrookinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Champion Gold Mining Co. v. Champion MinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Shermaster v. California Home Building Loan Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.