Worley v. Nethercott
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tehama County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Belcher, C.
In January, 1889, the plaintiff was residing upon and claiming to own certain real property in the town of Red Bluff, Tehama County. On the 26th of that month, plaintiff verbally agreed, to sell the real property and some personal property to the defendant, for the sum of $1,880, and to' let him take immediate possession thereof. Plaintiff was to give a warranty deed of the real property, conveying a good and perfect title thereto, and defendant was to pay $1,000 cash, and give his note for $880, bearing interest at the rate of ten per cent per annum, but it was not stated how long…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Gates v. McLeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Rhorer v. BilaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by22 opinions
- Hines v. BrodeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Runyan v. Pacific Air Industries, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1970
- Garvey v. LashellsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Kent v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Waugh v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1938
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.