Legal Opinion
Attorney General Ex Rel. McKenzie v. Warner
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided June 12, 1941No. Docket No. 75, Calendar No. 41,577PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The attorney general, upon the relation of a citizen and taxpayer, has filed an information in the nature of quowarranto asking that Howard M. Warner be required to show by what authority he claims to hold the office of State corporation and securities commissioner for a term expiring September 20, 1943. The facts are not in dispute. On September 20, 1935, the then governor appointed a corporation and securities commissioner for a term ending September 20, 1939, by virtue of Act No. 13, Pub. Acts 1935 (Comp. Laws Supp. 1940, §§ 9769-1 to 9,769-4, Stat. Ann. §§ 19.781-19.784). The legislature…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Attorney General, Ex Rel. Owen v. JoyceMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
- Barrett v. DuffSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
- People v. ShawyerWyoming Supreme Court · 1924
- Attorney General Ex Rel. Eaves v. State Bridge CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
- Attorney General ex rel. Dust v. OakmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Nogueras v. Hernández ColónSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1991
- González v. Corte de Distrito de San JuanSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1943
- Acosta y Acosta v. Corte de Distrito de BayamónSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1944
- Acosta v. District Court of BayamónSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1944
- Attorney General v. RileyMichigan Supreme Court · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.