Legal Opinion

Attorney General Ex Rel. Eaves v. State Bridge Commission

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1936No. Docket No. 118, Calendar No. 39,084PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] The parties agree upon the facts and the questions involved.

The State bridge commission created by Act No. 147, Pub. Acts 1935 is authorized to acquire, improve, construct, operate and maintain certain specified public works, which, by definition in the act, shall include "all property, rights, easements and franchises relating thereto and deemed necessary or convenient for their operation and shall embrace an international bridge over and ferries across the St.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Tranter v. Alleghency County Co. AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. State and Diver v. City of MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  3. Alabama State Bridge Corporation v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  4. Young v. City of Ann ArborMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Brazos River Conservation & Reclamation District v. McCrawTexas Supreme Court · 1936

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Taxpayers of Michigan Against Casinos v. StateMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Alan v. Wayne CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  3. City of Gaylord v. Gaylord City ClerkMichigan Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Boswell v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  5. North Carolina Turnpike Authority v. Pine Island, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API