Legal Opinion

Acosta v. District Court of Bayamón

Supreme Court of Puerto Rico

Decided May 17, 1944No. 8Published

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Ci-iiee ■ Justice Travieso

delivered the opinion of the court.

Act No. 57 of April 28, 1930 (Laws of 1930, p. 144), under which the District Court for the Judicial District of Ba-yamón was created, provides:

“Section 2. The Governor of Porto Eico, with the advice and consent of the Insular Senate, shall appoint for a term of four years, and until their successors shall-have been appointed, the following officers for said Court:

A district prosecuting attorney, at an annual salary of $3,850.” (Italics ours.)

*627Pursuant to the provisions of this Act, on February 3, 1939, the Governor of Puerto…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Heyward v. LongSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
  2. Territory of New Mexico ex rel. Klock v. MannNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Attorney General Ex Rel. McKenzie v. WarnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API