Legal Opinion

Barrett v. Duff

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 7, 1923No. 24,930; No. 24,950; No. 24,955PublishedCited by 37 opinions

Original proceeding in quo warranto.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hopkins, J.:

These are original proceedings in quo warranto to determine the titles to the offices of state inspector of oils, judge of the court of industrial relations, and member of the public utilities commission. The facts briefly stated are as follows:

Harvey H. Motter was appointed state oil inspector by Governor Henry J. Allen for a term of four years, beginning March 31, 1921. His appointment was confirmed by the senate March 16, 1921. October 18, 1921, he resigned, effective November 1, 1921, and on October 18, 1921, the defendant Hugh Duff was…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Carson v. HarrisonIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Crovatt v. MasonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  3. State ex inf. Major ex rel. Sikes v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  4. Sewell v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
  5. People ex rel. Ryder v. MiznerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Leek v. TheisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
  2. Sedlak v. DickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
  3. People v. ShawyerWyoming Supreme Court · 1924
  4. State ex rel. Wheat v. MooreSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
  5. McChesney v. Sampson, GovernorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API