Legal Opinion · Dissent
Attorney General v. Riley
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided February 15, 1983No. 70876, (Calendar No. 1)Published
1Dissent
Ryan and Brickley, JJ.,
state: We dissent from the Court’s reconsideration of this matter and dissent from the judgment of ouster for the reasons stated in Justice Ryan’s opinion of February 11, 1983.
*218Opinion Filed February 16, 1983
Levin, J.
My opinion in the instant case, filed Friday afternoon, February 11, 1983, concluded with the following statement:
"Because I am of the opinion that no judgment of ouster should be issued at this time, I join in the decision to deny issuance of a judgment of ouster.” (Emphasis supplied.)
The opinion also states:
"The quo warranto complaint filed by the Attorney…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- McLeod v. McLeodMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
- Attorney General Ex Rel. McKenzie v. WarnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
- Attorney General Ex Rel. Bean v. ShowleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1943