Legal Opinion · Dissent

Attorney General v. Riley

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1983No. 70876, (Calendar No. 1)Published

1Dissent

Ryan and Brickley, JJ.,

state: We dissent from the Court’s reconsideration of this matter and dissent from the judgment of ouster for the reasons stated in Justice Ryan’s opinion of February 11, 1983.

*218Opinion Filed February 16, 1983

Levin, J.

My opinion in the instant case, filed Friday afternoon, February 11, 1983, concluded with the following statement:

"Because I am of the opinion that no judgment of ouster should be issued at this time, I join in the decision to deny issuance of a judgment of ouster.” (Emphasis supplied.)

The opinion also states:

"The quo warranto complaint filed by the Attorney…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McLeod v. McLeodMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Attorney General Ex Rel. McKenzie v. WarnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Attorney General Ex Rel. Bean v. ShowleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API