Legal Opinion
Skaggs v. City of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 4, 1956No. Civ. 21121PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NOURSE (Paul), J. pro tem. *
By his complaint in this matter the plaintiff sought declaratory relief and a writ of mandate directing the defendant city and its board of pension commissioners to pay him the amount of accrued pensions which he claimed were due him.
The facts, insofar as they are relevant to this appeal are:
Plaintiff entered the service of the city of Los Angeles as a policeman the first day of April, 1925. After the completion of 20 years' service and on July 9, 1945, he applied for a pension pursuant to the provisions of the charter of defendant city and an ordinance enacted to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Los Angeles Dredging Co. v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Steelduct Co. v. Henger-Seltzer Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Hampton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Hansen v. CramerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Trower v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- DiGenova v. State Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Ayyad v. Sprint SpectrumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Plumbing, Heating & Piping Employers Council v. QuillinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Puritan Leasing Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Adler v. City of PasadenaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.