Legal Opinion

Plumbing, Heating & Piping Employers Council v. Quillin

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 29, 1976No. Civ. 39307PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TAYLOR, P. J.

On this appeal by Plumbing, Heating and Piping Employers Council, et al. (hereafter Employers Council) from a portion of an order dated April 5, 1976, denying its motion for attorney’s fees, pursuant to Government Code section 800, the only question is whether the trial court abused its discretion. We affirm, as the record indicates that the question of whether there was any arbitrary or capricious conduct by defendants, the State Labor Commissioner and his deputies (hereafter Labor Commissioner) was not timely raised.

The merits of the instant matter were before this court…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Hollman v. WarrenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Mandel v. HodgesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  3. T.E.D. Bearing Co. v. Walter E. Heller & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1974
  4. Healdsburg Police Officers Ass'n v. City of HealdsburgCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. Olson v. HickmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Folsom v. Butte County Assn. of GovernmentsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Epstein v. Hollywood Entertainment District II Business Improvement DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  3. Kreutzer v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. Gilliland v. Medical BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  5. Cerini v. City of CloverdaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API