Puritan Leasing Co. v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THOMPSON, J.
—The case at bench raises the issue of the consequences to retrial of an appellate reversal and remand for “proceedings consistent with the views expressed” in the appellate opinion. We conclude: (1) where the appellate opinion uses the phrase to incorporate by reference portions of the body of the opinion into the pronouncement of appellate judgment, the trial court, on retrial, is bound by the incorporated portions as if they were included as an express specific direction on remand, and (2) any portion of the opinion not so incorporated has the less stringent effect of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Estate of HormanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Hampton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- English v. Olympic Auditorium, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1935
- Pillsbury v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Nolan v. NolanOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Griset v. Fair Political Practices CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Hawley v. RitleyOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Los Angeles Branch Naacp v. Los Angeles Unified School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Phillips v. Sprint PCSCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.