Legal Opinion

Hansen v. Cramer

California Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 1952No. L. A. 21902PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of non-suit in an action to set aside a conveyance allegedly made to defraud creditors. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to plaintiff, with every legitimate inference drawn in his favor and inconsistencies disregarded (Berger v. Lane, 190 Cal. 443, 452-453 [213 P. 45]; Milana v. Credit Discount Co., 27 Cal.2d 335, 342-343 [163 P.2d 869, 165 A.L.R. 621]), *323it must be concluded that the court erred in granting defendants’ motions for nonsuit made at the close of plaintiff’s case.

Plaintiff’s assignor obtained a judgment against defendant Carole…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Milana v. Credit Discount Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Berger v. LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Chalmers v. SheehyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. McCaslin v. SchoutenMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Kline v. Inland Rubber Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1949

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Decker v. Tramiel (In Re JTS Corp.)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  2. Mayo v. Pioneer Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  3. Pierce v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1974
  4. Shelly v. DoeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  5. Rozan v. RozanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API