Legal Opinion

Burke v. Dittus

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 23, 1908No. Civ. No. 470PublishedCited by 6 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.

This is an action to foreclose a mechanic’s-, lien. A special demurrer to the complaint was overruled, after which the defendant answered. Thereafter a jury trial was demanded, and the court, at the request of the defendant, submitted to the jury one issue—“Was the building contract as modified, between plaintiff’s assignors and the defendant F. M. Dittus, substantially performed on the part of plaintiff’s assignors prior, to the 31st day of August, 1905?”' The jury brought in a verdict in favor of plaintiff, and the-court thereafter adopted this verdict, and, upon the hearing-of further…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Holmes v. RichetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Penrose v. WinterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Ryan v. HollidayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Richards v. Travelers' InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Grant v. SheerinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. A. D. Hoppe Co. v. Fred Katz Constr. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1967
  2. Cullinan v. Mercantile Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1926
  3. Smith v. BentsonAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1932
  4. Stewart v. SpaldingHawaii Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Fancher v. BrungerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API