Legal Opinion
Fancher v. Brunger
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 21, 1949No. Civ. 17365PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDrapeau, J.
After her claim therefor had been rejected, plaintiff brought this action against defendant as executrix of the last will and testament of Emilie DeLonee, deceased, to recover the sum of $5,000, alleged to be the reasonable value of services rendered by plaintiff to the deceased at the latter’s special instance and request. It is also alleged in the complaint that for the services described therein and other similar services decedent “informed Plaintiff on more than one occasion that she would receive proper reimbursement from her estate.”
According to the complaint, the services were rendered…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Zellner v. WassmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Long v. RumseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Mayborne v. Citizens Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Wainwright Trust Co. v. KinderIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918
- Hagan v. McNaryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- McCollum v. ClothierUtah Supreme Court · 1952
- Lubin v. LubinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Israelsky v. Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Blumer v. Kirkman CorporationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Swafford v. GoodmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.