Grant v. Sheerin
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Belcher, C. C.
This is an action for an accounting, and to recover money alleged to be due the plaintiff.
The complaint alleges that one John Grant, the plaintiff’s testator, was the owner of a certain marble monument of great value, and that, for the purpose of effecting a sale thereof, he placed the monument in the possession of the defendant, with authority to sell it; that defendant accepted the monument for and on account of said Grant, and took and held the same until some time in May, 1885, when, under the authority so given, he sold it, as plaintiff is informed and believes, for the sum…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Harnish v. BramerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Tehama County v. BryanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Scroufe v. ClayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
3Cited by17 opinions
- Mullally v. TownsendCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Gardner v. DonnellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Deegan Ex Rel. Neligh v. DeeganNevada Supreme Court · 1894
- Arizona Eastern Railroad v. Globe Hardware Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1913
- Pembrook v. HoustonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.