Legal Opinion
A. D. Hoppe Co. v. Fred Katz Constr. Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 3, 1967No. Civ. 29536PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCobey, J.
This is an appeal from an order denying appellant’s petition to compel arbitration and its motion to stay this action between the parties pending such arbitration.
The appeal lies. (Code Civ. Proc., §§1294, subd. (a), 1294.2; Berman v. Renart Sportswear Corp., 222 Cal.App.2d 385, 387-388 [35 Cal.Rptr. 218].)
In May 1962, appellant, a general contractor, entered into a written contract with Congregation Beth Hillel to construct a new classroom building for this owner at a specified location on Riverside Drive in North Hollywood. Subsequently, in May and September 1962, appellant entered into…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Berman v. Renart Sportswear Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1963
- Sawday v. Vista Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Jordan v. Pacific Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Loscalzo v. Federal Mutual InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Engleman v. GreenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Platt Pacific, Inc. v. AndelsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Johnston v. Security InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Spear v. California State Automobile Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Titan Group, Inc. v. Sonoma Valley County Sanitation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Correia v. NB Baker Elec., Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.