Legal Opinion
In Re Tanner
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided December 28, 2006No. 06-BG-278PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Per curiam
In this disciplinary proceeding against respondent Martin S. Tanner, 1 a member of the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, the Board on Professional Responsibility (“Board”) has recommended to this court that reciprocal and functionally identical discipline be imposed in the form of a five-year suspension with a requirement to prove fitness as a condition of reinstatement. No exceptions to the Board’s Report and Recommendation have been filed.
On November 1, 2002, the Utah Supreme Court granted its consent to respondent’s petition to resign with discipline pending and permitting…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re GoldsboroughDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- In Re ZilberbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- In Re DelaneyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- In Re SpannDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- In Re ChildressDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re DavyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- In Re LebowitzDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008