Legal Opinion

In Re Goldman

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided November 9, 2006No. 05-BG-484PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

On March 31, 2006, in this reciprocal disciplinary proceeding, the Board on Professional Responsibility recommended that Steven F. Goldman, a member of our Bar, be suspended from practice in the District of Columbia for five years and that his reinstatement be conditioned upon proof of fitness to practice. Neither Bar Counsel nor Goldman has excepted to this recommendation, and we adopt it.

In 2004, Goldman resigned from the New York Bar while he was the subject of an investigation by that state’s disciplinary authorities of allegations of misconduct. On December 16, 2004, Goldman executed a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re GoldsboroughDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. In Re RichardsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. In Re BrownDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. In Re AngelDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re JaffeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
  2. In Re Karen JaffeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
  3. In Re ParkerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API