Legal Opinion
Michigan Central Railroad v. Chicago, Kalamazoo & Saginaw Railway Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided March 5, 1903No. Docket No. 19PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Appeal from Kalamazoo; Adams, J. Bill by the Michigan Central Railroad Company against the Chicago, Kalamazoo & Saginaw Railway Company and the Kalamazoo Paper Company to enjoin interference with certain side tracks. Prom a decree dismissing the bill, complainant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtCarpenter, J.
Complainant appeals from a decree of the circuit court for the county of Kalamazoo, in chancery, dismissing a bill of complaint in which it seeks an injunction to prevent defendants violating rights which it claims by virtue of the following contract:
“This agreement, made this fourteenth day of April, A. D. 1898, between the Wolverine Paper Company, hereinafter, for convenience, called the ‘first party,’ and the Michigan Central Railroad Company, hereinafter called the ‘second party,’ witnesses:
*326“ Whereas, the first party has requested the second party to construct and lay a side track one and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Keokuk & Hamilton Bridge Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Jacksonville, Mayport, Pablo Railway & Navigation Co. v. HooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Davie v. Lumberman's Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Scott v. Middletown, Unionville & Water-Gap RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Davies v. Harvey Steel Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kerschensteiner v. Northern Michigan Land Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
- Dickinson v. Citizens Ice & Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
- Aggeller & Musser Seed Co. v. BloodUtah Supreme Court · 1928
- Carnahan v. M. J. & B. M. Buck Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1930
- Smith-Powers Logging Co. v. BernittCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1916