Legal Opinion

Dickinson v. Citizens Ice & Fuel Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 11, 1918No. Nos. 20,649, 20,650PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Two actions in the district court for Ramsey county to recover $1,100 and $2,750, respectively. The facts are stated in the opinion. Defendant’s motion to set aside a stipulation of settlement for the reason stated at the end of the second paragraph of the opinion was denied, Michael, J. From the order denying its motion and from the judgment entered pursuant to the .stipulation, defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

Defendant appeals in two cases from the orders denying its motion to vacate a stipulation for judgment and from the judgments entered pursuant to the stipulation. The cases are precisely alike, except as to the amounts involved, and are treated as one appeal.

In August, 1916, plaintiffs began their suits, alleging fraud in the sale of certain shares of defendant’s capital stock, and asking for a rescission of the sale and a return of the purchase money. The defense was a general denial and a ratification of the sale after discovering the true situation. The actions were reached for trial early…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bank of United States v. DandridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  2. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Keokuk & Hamilton Bridge Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Indianapolis Rolling Mill v. St. Louis, Fort Scott & Wichita RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  4. Ford v. HillWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Scott v. Middletown, Unionville & Water-Gap RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1881

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Scheele v. Union Loan & Finance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  2. Strader v. HaleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  3. Doehler v. Real Estate Board of New York Building Co.New York Supreme Court · 1934
  4. City of St. Paul v. BielenbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  5. Berman v. Minneapolis Photo Engraving Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API