Legal Opinion

Davie v. Lumberman's Mining Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1892PublishedCited by 41 opinions

Error to Menominee. (Stone, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtDurand, J.

On October 7, 1889, the plaintiffs, Who were practical miners, entered into a verbal agreement with the defendant company, through its mining captain, to go to work in what- is called the “ Cave Pit," and were to receive $1.50 per ton for all the ore they produced, as long as they could malee it pay. The plaintiffs practically agree that the mining captain, with whom the contract was made, said to them that he would give $1.50 a ton for all the ore they could produce anywhere in the pit, to which they responded, “ All- right; we will take the contract, and work it as long as toe can malee it…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Blanchard v. Detroit, Lansing & Lake Michigan RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Cummer v. ButtsMichigan Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Cold Blast Transp. Co. v. Kansas City Bolt & Nut Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
  2. Johnson v. Breckenridge-Stephens Title Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1924
  3. Loudenback Fertilizer Co. v. Tennessee Phosphate Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1903
  4. Fowler Utilities Co. v. GrayIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  5. American Cotton Oil Co. v. KirkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1895

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API