Legal Opinion

Carnahan v. M. J. & B. M. Buck Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1930No. Docket No. 157, Calendar No. 34,236PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

In a law case tried without a jury, where no exceptions are taken to the findings, the only question open on review is that the findings do not support the judgment, provided it is raised by assignment of error.

In this case there are no exceptions, and the suggested question is not raised in apt words, but it is raised substantially. No assignment is on the findings of fact; all are addressed to the conclusion thereon, the judgment. We think it our duty to determine whether the findings support the judgment.

Defendant for many years has been a Michigan corporation in the retail furniture…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McQuaide v. Enterprise Brewing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1910
  2. Fudickar v. GlennCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1916
  3. Michigan Central Railroad v. Chicago, Kalamazoo & Saginaw Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Spitzer v. Born, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
  5. Anchor Steam Bottling Works v. BaumleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Baks v. MorounMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Fine Arts Corp. v. Kuchins Furniture Manfg. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Lorren v. Baroda Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Baks v. MorounMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API