Legal Opinion

Aggeller & Musser Seed Co. v. Blood

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1928No. 4581PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThurman, C. J.

This action was commenced by the plaintiff, a California corporation, located in the city of Los Angeles, against the Guaranteed Securities Company, a Utah, corporation, located in Salt Lake City. By stipulation of the parties George H. Blood, receiver for the Utah corporation, was substituted as defendant. The California corporation will hereinafter be referred to as plaintiff, and for brevity the Utah company will be referred to as defendant.

It is alleged in the complaint that on or about the 21st day of March, 1923, plaintiff and defendant entered into a lease agreement by the terms of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Currie v. BowmanOregon Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Mobile & Montgomery Railway Co. v. GilmerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
  3. Black v. Harrison Home Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Scott v. Middletown, Unionville & Water-Gap RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  5. Campbell v. PopeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1888

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Swan Creek Village Homeowners Ass'n v. WarneUtah Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Featherstone v. SchaerrerUtah Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Featherstone v. SchaerrerUtah Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Lake Creek Irrigation Co. v. ClydeUtah Supreme Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API