Legal Opinion

Standish v. Sotavento Corp.

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided July 18, 2000No. AC 18677PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HENNESSY, J.

The plaintiffs1 appeal from the judgment of the trial court rendered following the granting of a motion for summary judgment filed by the named defendant, Sotavento Corporation (Sotavento), a licensed Connecticut brokerage.2 On appeal, the plaintiffs claim that the court improperly concluded that there were no genuine issues of material fact in dispute. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The following facts were before the court. The plaintiffs, limited partners of the defendant Momingside Partners Limited Partnership (Momingside), commenced this derivative action in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Miller v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  2. Mozzochi v. BeckSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  3. Avon Meadow Condominium Ass'n v. Bank of Boston ConnecticutConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
  4. Tarzia v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1999
  5. Noble v. MarshallConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Behrens v. WedmoreSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Biller Associates v. PeterkenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  3. Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. WindhamConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  4. Ankerman v. MancusoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  5. Sotavento Corp. v. Coastal Pallet Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API