Legal Opinion

Biller Associates v. Peterken

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 22, 2004No. SC 16387PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PALMER, J.

Rule 1.15 (b) of the Rules of Professional Conduct provides: “Upon receiving funds or other property in which a client or third person has an interest, a lawyer shall promptly notify the client or third person. Except as stated in this rule or otherwise permitted by law or by agreement with the client, a lawyer shall promptly deliver to the client or third person any funds or other property that the client or third person is entitled to receive and, upon request by the client or third person, shall promptly render a full accounting regarding such property.” The primary issue…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jackson v. R. G. Whipple, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  2. Mozzochi v. BeckSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  3. Hi-Ho Tower, Inc. v. Com-Tronics, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  4. Dugan v. Mobile Medical Testing Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  5. Noble v. MarshallConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Glazer v. Dress Barn, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  2. Accident & Injury Medical Specialists, P.C. v. MintzSupreme Court of Colorado · 2012
  3. Sherwood v. Danbury HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  4. Mintz v. Accident & Injury Medical Specialists, PCColorado Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. Chioffi v. MartinConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API