Legal Opinion
Noble v. Marshall
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 11, 1990No. 8705PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFoti, J.
The defendant appeals from the judgment rendered following the court’s granting of the plaintiff’s motion to strike her counterclaim. The sole issue presented in this appeal is whether the facts as alleged, including a claimed violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct, give rise to a claim of violation of the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA), General Statutes § 42-110a et seq. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The plaintiff brought the present action against the defendant for the nonpayment of attorney’s fees in connection with legal services rendered. The defendant…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. Sperry & Hutchinson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Mead v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Mozzochi v. BeckSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- McLaughlin Ford, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Heslin v. Connecticut Law Clinic of Trantolo & TrantoloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Biller Associates v. PeterkenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Hultman v. BlumenthalConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Brunswick v. Inland Wetlands CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
- Leavenworth v. MathesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. WindhamConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.