Legal Opinion
Graydon v. Pasadena Redevelopment Agency
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 25, 1980No. Civ. 56242PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McCLOSKY, J. *
This is an appeal from a judgment and order denying a writ of mandate and awarding costs of suit to respondent, Ernest W. Hahn, Inc. (hereafter Hahn).
Respondent the Pasadena Redevelopment Agency (hereafter sometimes Agency and sometimes PRA), following many studies, plans and negotiations, entered into an agreement in 1975 with a developer (H-CHH Associates, a partnership comprised of respondent Hahn and Carter Hale Hawley Stores, Inc.) for the development in Pasadena’s blighted central business district of a major retail shopping center.
To finance the public cost of the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- In Re OlsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- County of Sacramento v. HickmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Caminetti v. Pac. Mut. Life Ins. Co. of Cal.California Supreme Court · 1943
- United States v. Purcell Envelope Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Silver v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Rider v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Friedland v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Domar Electric, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Smith v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Kaatz v. CITY OF SEASIDECalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.