Legal Opinion

Andrews v. Joint Clerks Port Labor Relations Committee

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 11, 1966No. Civ. 22504PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, P. J.

The fundamental question which we must decide in this case is whether the trial judge was disqualified to act because of a peremptory challenge directed against him pursuant to the provisions of Code of Civil Procedure section 170.6. As we explain infra, we have concluded that the instant proceeding in which disqualification was sought, although designated by a , different number in the court below, was in reality a part and continuation of other proceedings pending therein in which the same trial judge had previously heard a matter involving a contested issue of law or fact and that the…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. MacLeod v. Tribune Publishing Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Temescal Water Co. v. Department of Public WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Lingsch v. SavageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Lemoge Electric v. County of San MateoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Jacobs v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. McCartney v. Commission on Judicial QualificationsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Ball v. City Council of CoachellaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. Stephens v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  4. City of Hanford v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  5. Muller v. TannerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API