Legal Opinion

Baker v. Littman

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 17, 1956No. Civ. 21224PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFox, J.

Respondent filed an action in the Municipal Court of Los Angeles for the recovery of $1,024.53, alleged to be the reasonable value of legal services rendered at the request of defendants, who are the appellants herein. The defendants named are Alfred Littman, Harry Umann, and their respective spouses. After answering, each defendant individually filed a cross-complaint in excess of the jurisdiction of the municipal court and the cause was transferred to the superior court. Respondent filed a special demurrer to, and motion to strike, the cross-complaint of Alfred Littman. General demurrers…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Wennerholm v. Stanford University School of MedicineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Klopstock v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Columbia Pictures Corp. v. DeTothCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Routh v. QuinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. The Edward Barron Estate Co. v. the Woodruff Co.California Supreme Court · 1912

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Babb v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. First Bank (N.A.) — Billings v. ClarkMontana Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Wohlgemuth v. MeyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. Karpe v. Great American Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. Hill v. WratherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API