Legal Opinion

Moore v. Schneider

California Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1925No. Docket No. L.A. 7836PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, J.

The defendants, William Schneider and R. R. Miller, as copartners and as individuals, made a non-statutory assignment of all their property not exempt from execution to the plaintiff, Moore, as assignee, for the benefit of creditors signing the agreement or consenting thereto. Moore subsequently brought this action to obtain a decree declaring that he, as such assignee, is the owner of the equitable title to certain real property, it being alleged that Sophie M. Schneider, wife of the assignor, William Schneider, among others, asserted an adverse claim to that of the assignee. By complaint in…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Brown v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Frink v. RoeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Bell v. PleasantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Ruggles v. CannedyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Lamont v. . CheshireNew York Court of Appeals · 1875

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Severance v. Knight-Counihan Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Bartold v. Glendale Federal BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  3. Kalt v. YoungworthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Cortez v. VogtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  5. Taylor v. HawkinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API