Legal Opinion

Kalt v. Youngworth

California Supreme Court

Decided December 26, 1940No. L. A. 16728PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.

In 1932 Ella Kalt died leaving a will in which she bequeathed the residue of hesr estate to her two sons, Earl Kalt and Stanley Kalt, after making certain minor bequests to their wives and to her grandchildren. Stanley Kalt was appointed executor by the probate court pursuant to the terms of the will. Shortly thereafter two actions on promissory notes were commenced against Stanley Kalt, in his individual capacity, and his wife Loretta, by Leo Young-worth, administrator of the estate of R. P. Goings. Writs of attachment were levied upon the interests of Stanley and Loretta Kalt in the…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Martin v. . FunkNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Brooks v. MarburySupreme Court of the United States · 1826
  3. Milholland v. WhalenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1899
  4. Booth v. Oakland Bank of SavingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  5. City of Boston v. TurnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Estate of PlattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Stein v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  3. United States v. Alcaraz-GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  4. Cortez v. VogtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  5. McQuarrie v. KuttlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API