Bell v. Pleasant
California Supreme Court
The facts are-stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
This is an action by the plaintiff against the defendants to cancel a deed executed by the defendant Mary E. Pleasant to the defendant Solomons on February 4, 1897, and certain other deeds thereafter executed by the defendant Solomons and his successors whereby the title acquired by Solomons was vested in the defendant Leo Block. The defendants appearéd and answered, and after trial findings were made in favor of the defendants and judgment was entered accordingly. The plaintiff appeals from the judgment and from an order denying her motion for a new trial.
The complaint in substance alleges…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Kenniff v. CaulfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Hart v. ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Tillaux v. TillauxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Eversdon v. MayhewCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Smith v. YuleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Munger v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Moore v. SchneiderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- North American Uranium, Inc. v. JohnstonWyoming Supreme Court · 1957
- Buckeye Refining Co. v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Hibernia Sav. and Loan Soc. v. FarnhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.