Legal Opinion
Cortez v. Vogt
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 10, 1997No. D021806PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NARES, J.
Under the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (UFTA), embodied in Civil Code 1 section 3439 et seq., on April 30, 1993, Manuel Cortez filed an action against William Vogt, Betty Vogt and Doe defendants (collectively, the Vogts) seeking to set aside an alleged fraudulent transfer occurring in August 1987. On May 20,1994, the trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the Vogts, finding the complaint is barred by the statute of limitations set forth in section 3439.09.
Cortez appeals, contending (1) the four-year statute of limitations of section 3439.09 was tolled during the…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Leal v. Holy Spirit Ass'n for Unification of World ChristianityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Stationers Corp. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1965
- People v. CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Mann v. CracchioloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Neilson v. Union Bank of California, N.A.District Court, C.D. California · 2003
- Kirkeby v. Superior Court of Orange CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- SASCO 1997 NI, LLC v. ZudkewichSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
- GEA Group AG v. Flex-N-Gate CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- Moore v. BrowningCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.