Legal Opinion

Lemen v. Edmunson

California Supreme Court

Decided December 24, 1927No. Docket No. L.A. 8910PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment for the defendant in an action brought by. plaintiffs for a commission alleged to have been earned by them in negotiating a sale of real property for the defendant. The amended complaint alleged that plaintiffs were duly licensed real estate brokers in the county of Los Angeles; that on October 26, 1923, they entered into a contract with the defendant wherein and whereby the defendant agreed to pay them a commission in the event of the sale by them of certain of the defendant’s property described in the contract; that on November 3, 1923, the plaintiffs…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
  2. Brecheen v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Chinn v. Superior Court of San Joaquin Cty.California Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Tyler v. PresleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Millsap v. AldersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. California Redevelopment Ass'n v. MatosantosCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  2. In Re Petition of Idaho State Fed. of Labor (Afl)Idaho Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Saxton v. Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Cox v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1951
  5. California Redevelopment Ass'n v. MatosantosCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API