Lemen v. Edmunson
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment for the defendant in an action brought by. plaintiffs for a commission alleged to have been earned by them in negotiating a sale of real property for the defendant. The amended complaint alleged that plaintiffs were duly licensed real estate brokers in the county of Los Angeles; that on October 26, 1923, they entered into a contract with the defendant wherein and whereby the defendant agreed to pay them a commission in the event of the sale by them of certain of the defendant’s property described in the contract; that on November 3, 1923, the plaintiffs…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
- Brecheen v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Chinn v. Superior Court of San Joaquin Cty.California Supreme Court · 1909
- Tyler v. PresleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Millsap v. AldersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- California Redevelopment Ass'n v. MatosantosCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- In Re Petition of Idaho State Fed. of Labor (Afl)Idaho Supreme Court · 1954
- Saxton v. Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Cox v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1951
- California Redevelopment Ass'n v. MatosantosCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.