Legal Opinion
Millsap v. Alderson
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 25, 1923No. Civ. No. 3951PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] This is an appeal from a judgment annulling oncertiorari an order of the Board of Medical Examiners revoking respondent's certificate to practice naturopathy in the state of California.
Respondent was licensed to practice naturopathy on August 6, 1909, and immediately thereafter entered upon the practice of his profession, and has ever since continued said practice. During all of said time respondent, in addition to the practice of naturopathy and without any…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Chinn v. Superior Court of San Joaquin Cty.California Supreme Court · 1909
- Vallejo & Northern Railroad v. Reed Orchard Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
- Fletcher v. PratherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- In Re RustCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- In Re GerberCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Collier & Wallis, Ltd. v. AstorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Whitten v. California State Board of OptometryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Hall v. SteeleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Janeway v. State Board of Chiropractic ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1950
- Miller v. JohnsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1982
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.