Legal Opinion

Saxton v. Board of Education

California Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1929No. Docket No. L.A. 10919PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

The plaintiff was a teacher in the public schools of the city of Los Angeles, and prior to the commencement of this action had been classified as a permanent teacher in said public schools, and remained such until her alleged wrongful dismissal by the defendant Board of Education of said school district. She instituted this action for the purpose of having said order of dismissal declared and adjudged null and void; that she be reinstated and permitted to continue to serve in said public schools as a permanent teacher and for the sum of $286, which amount, it was alleged, was due her as…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Pacific Telephone Etc. Co. v. EshlemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Kennedy v. Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Grigsby v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Blalock v. RidgwayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. Raisch v. Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Modern Barber Colleges, Inc. v. California Employment Stabilization CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. School City of Elwood v. State Ex Rel. GriffinIndiana Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Fidler v. Board of TrusteesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  4. Martin v. FisherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. Midway School District v. GriffeathCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API