Legal Opinion

California Redevelopment Ass'n v. Matosantos

California Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 2011No. S194861PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 12/29/11 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA REDEVELOPMENT ) ASSOCIATION et al., ) ) Petitioners, ) ) S194861 v. ) ) ANA MATOSANTOS, as Director, etc., ) et al., ) ) Respondents; ) ) COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA et al., ) ) Interveners and Respondents. ) ____________________________________) Responding to a declared state fiscal emergency, in the summer of 2011 the Legislature enacted two measures intended to stabilize school funding by reducing or eliminating the diversion of property tax revenues from school districts to the state‘s community redevelopment agencies. (Assem. Bill…

2Cases cited77 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Whitman v. American Trucking Assns., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. People v. Superior Court (Romero)California Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Kwikset Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sam Francis Foundation v. Christies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  2. County of Sonoma v. CohenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  3. Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Assn. v. PadillaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
  4. City of El Centro v. LanierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  5. Sam Francis Foundation v. Christies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API