Legal Opinion

Grange Mutual Casualty Co. v. Volkmann

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1978No. 77-692PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCelebbezze, J.

The sole issue presented-by the instant appeal is whether it is permissible for an insurer, which is ' providing uninsured motorist coverage to its insured’s three vehicles under individual policies of insurance, •to'avoid liability under all but one of those coverages by inserting in each insurance contract the “other owned vehicle exclusion set out above.3 Appellant insurer would *61have this court enforce such contractual provisions in the policies covering the two uninvolved Volkmann automobiles since the insureds (i e., Volkmann’s two daughters) have sustained bodily injuries while…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Mullis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1971
  2. Abate v. Pioneer Mutual Casualty Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Curran v. State Automobile Mutual Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Nygaard v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Hinkel Ex Rel. HinkelNevada Supreme Court · 1971

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Savoie v. Grange Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Karabin v. State Automobile Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Kish v. Central National Insurance GroupOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Welch v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Hedrick v. Motorists Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1986

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API