Legal Opinion

Nygaard v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 9, 1974No. 44405 and 44406PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Justice.

In two separate actions in the St. Louis County District Court, plaintiffs Kenneth B. Erickson, father and natural guardian of Kenneth R. Erickson, a minor, and John S. and Arnold E. Nygaard were granted orders for judgment against their insurer, defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. Defendant appeals from the trial court’s orders denying its post-trial motions in each case for amended findings or new trial. The appeals were by stipulation consolidated since, under stipulation to facts, both cases present a common question of law concerning the validity…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Mullis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1971
  2. State Farm Automobile Insurance Co. v. ReavesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  3. Elledge v. WarrenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Hinkel Ex Rel. HinkelNevada Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Lowery v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1973

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Calvert v. Farmers Ins. Co. of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Royal Indemnity Co. v. BlakelyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  3. Harvey v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  4. Cardin v. Royal Insurance Co. of AmericaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  5. Integrity Mutual Insurance v. State Automobile & Casualty Underwriters InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API