Legal Opinion
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Hinkel Ex Rel. Hinkel
Nevada Supreme Court
Decided September 28, 1971No. 6433PublishedCited by 65 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*480OPINION
By the Court,
Batjer, L:
The facts in this case are not in dispute. On September 12, 1968, the respondent, Gordon John Hinkel, a minor, while operating a Honda motorcycle owned by him, was involved in an accident with an uninsured motorist. The collision was caused by the negligence of the uninsured motorist. The respondent, Donald Eugene Hinkel, who is Gordon’s father, owned a 1963 Thunderbird automobile which had been insured by the appellant. The policy included coverage for damage sustained as a result of an accident with an uninsured motor vehicle. Gordon claimed that he sustained…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bryant v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1965
- Bankes v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Gulf American Fire & Casualty Co. v. McNealCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- Hendricks v. Meritplan InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Shipley v. American Standard Insurance Co. of Wis.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1968
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Calvert v. Farmers Ins. Co. of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Touchette v. Northwestern Mutual InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1972
- Bradley v. Mid-Century InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
- Harvey v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Cardin v. Royal Insurance Co. of AmericaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.