Hedrick v. Motorists Mutual Insurance
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.
Appellant asserts that the issue raised is whether the in-
surance policy provision in question constitutes a valid anti-stacking provision. After careful review of the policy provision in question, this court cannot concur in appellant’s assessment of the issue presented by these facts. Rather, this court finds that the issue presented in the case is whether the policy provision is an exclusionary provision which operates to bar recovery herein. For the reasons that follow, this court holds that the relevant provision is an exclusionary provision and, moreover, by its unambiguous terms,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Abate v. Pioneer Mutual Casualty Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1970
- Karabin v. State Automobile Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Ady v. West American InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- Curran v. State Automobile Mutual Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1971
- Grange Mutual Casualty Co. v. VolkmannOhio Supreme Court · 1978
3Cited by65 opinions
- Ross v. Farmers Insurance Group of CompaniesOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Martin v. Midwestern Group InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Kaminski v. Metal & Wire Products Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2010
- Dairyland Insurance v. FinchOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- Landskroner v. LandskronerOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.