Leasequip, Inc. v. Dapeer
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ALDRICH, J.
I. Introduction
Appellant and plaintiff Leasequip, Inc., a California Corporation, formerly known as Prudential Capital Corporation (Leasequip), appeals from an order of dismissal entered in favor of respondents and defendants Philip D. Dapeer, and Dapeer & Kirsch, a law corporation, a California corporation, formerly known as George & Dapeer, a law corporation (collectively referred to as Dapeer), upon sustaining Dapeer’s demurrer without leave to amend.
In the published portions of this opinion (pts. I., II., III., IV. A., B., C., V., and VI.) we answer “yes” to the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- People ex rel. Lungren v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Laird v. BlackerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Jordache Enterprises Inc. v. BrobeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Hendy v. LosseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Lantzy v. Centex HomesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Peregrine Funding, Inc. v. Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Jocer Enterprises, Inc. v. PriceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Jean Rustico v. Intuitive Surgical, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Friends of Shingle Springs Interchange, Inc. v. County of El DoradoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.